Andrew Breitbart contributor uploaded Shirley Sherrod video to YouTube, did he edit it too?
By now, you’re probably familiar with the name Andrew Breitbart. Andrew Breitbart posted the video of former USDA Director of Rural Development for Georgia on his website ‘Big Government’ on Monday. The video went viral and showed an edited clip where it appeared that Shirley Sherrod had admitted to using institutional racism against a white farmer during the height of the 80’s farm crisis.
Fox News picked up the story and ran with it. Before long, the entire nation had tuned in to see the case of the racist black woman who boasted about discriminating against white farmers while speaking from an NAACP platform.
The only problem was the video was edited and did not show the truth.
So who created the Shirley Sherrod edited video to begin with?
Though we aren’t sure who originally edited the video, we do know who uploaded it to YouTube as it remains there still.
The absurdity of $1.5 trillion annual deficits is easy to run on; but where in the budget should we freeze or cut spending? To restore fiscal sanity, we need details rather than vague promises to reduce red ink to a particular percentage of GDP. Is there to be an across-the-board spending freeze or targeted cuts? How much, if at all, does defense get cut? If it does, where and how?
Fairly or not, we are at the stage where, at least in the short term, each proposed dollar of tax cuts needs to be matched by a proposed dollar of spending reduction. The supply-side notion of expanding federal revenue through tax cuts and business stimulation remains of course valid. But in the here and now, the public needs concrete reality, not assurances about more money to come in within a year or two.
Amnesty — under the euphemism of comprehensive immigration reform” — would be a disaster. But in critiquing Obama’s policies, Republicans need to explain precisely how employer sanctions, increased patrols, and the completion of the fence will result in near-zero illegal entry. Then they must detail what exactly to do with the existing population of illegal aliens, which may well exceed 12 million — of whom most are neither felons nor unemployed.
Fuente: nationalreview.com
Latest model's all spruced up inside and out, and is light on fuel
When Toyota launched its premium brand back in 1990, the ES was the entry-level Lexus. Since the introduction of the IS model, the ES has moved both up and sideways in the Lexus product line up.
A front-drive sedan, the ES places a greater emphasis on passenger comfort than the smaller, sport-minded IS sedan, which can cost less -- or more than an ES -- depending on how it's equipped.
The last major revamp of ES was for the 2007 model year, and for 2010 its exterior gets spruced up and the interior gets some upgrades. Most important of all, there are new additions to its standard equipment list that include; active front seat head restraints with whiplash protection; rain-sensing wipers; an "off" switch for the vehicle stability control system; Bluetooth capability; an Eco (driving) indicator, and rear seat side airbags.
The 2010 Lexus ES 350 is now on sale at Lexus dealers across Canada with a manufacturer's suggested retail price that starts at $41,950. That's a $2,000 increase over last year's ES, but when you add all the extra base equipment it probably evens out. And there's also a choice of three option packages:
The Navigation Package ($3,850) adds a voice-activated, hard disc-based navigation system with backup camera, a USB audio input to the audio system and upgraded heated driver and front passenger seats with ventilation fans.
Premium Package with Navigation ($7,200) then adds power-adjustable variable driver cushion length, passenger-seat memory system, wood steering wheel and shift knob, power rear window sunshade, clearance and backup sensor and high-intensity discharge headlamps with the Lexus dual-swivel Adaptive Front Lighting System.
Ultra Premium Package with Navigation ($10,050) adds premium leather seat surfaces, a panoramic glass roof, an upgraded Mark Levinson Audio system featuring six-disc DVD changer and 14 speakers, and premium aluminum alloy wheels. It also brings the price of a fully-loaded ES to $52,000.
The Obama Deception”, one of Alex Jones’ most accepted quality films, and a contagious film that made a big impact on You Tube, has been removed behind its momentum of attracting people on the net and lately became the most searched keyword on major search engines from the internet. Within a few days, it became the number one spot on search engines when you type the keyword Obama.” Most of the readers have inquired why not we just re-upload the film on You Tube. Nonetheless, this is not the dominating issue regarding this matter.
Beside the crude violation of the primary modification, the mere truth that this restriction took place signifies that the huge number of links to the version of this video that received for about 6.5 million shares and views will at this time be shutdown all over the entire web.
Does it really coincide that they censored the film upload since it became the most searched link when you search the keyword Obama”?
Even Rush Limbaugh Can't Stand New York's Discriminatory Tax Laws
Rush Limbaugh has long railed against taxes on the wealthy, including New York's property taxes, which he was criticizing just last week. So you might say in selling his full-floor 10-room NYC apartment for $11.5 million(down from an asking price of $13.95M), he's finally making good on his promise to ditch New York State and its unfair taxation. Maybe Elton John taught him a few tips at his wedding?
Because gays also have a problem with New York State's tax code!
But not necessarily because it unfairly "discriminates" against the wealthy — of which, let's be sure, the majority of gays are not — but because it unfairly discriminates (no air quotes) against gays.
While New York continues to refuse to let gays marry in the state, it does recognize valid marriage licenses from other states. It does not, however, let them file taxes jointly. It requires you consider shared health insurance as taxable income. It doesn't let you deduct home mortgage interest. And it'll cost you a lot of cash to pay a tax professional just to learn all of this crap.
